IMF Falls Out of Favor With Everyone

Outraged cryptocurrency investors swiftly implicated a perpetrator when Argentina’s central bank placed a complete ban on selling digital content.

The South American nation had just committed to crack down on cryptocurrencies as a portion of a bailout deal with the International Financial Institutions.


SPECIAL: Get Your FREE Red Trump 2024 Hat Here

What People Are Saying

“The IMF is nasty,” one Twitter user said in reaction to the move last month, adding an image of an outstretched middle finger.

Tensions about the future of currency have risen in recent weeks on four continents. The custodians of the global financial system are progressively pushing back as western businessmen and emerging world governments launch new measures.

These measures are meant to convince countries to embrace Bitcoin as the main currency — and the Central African Republic joined El Salvador in doing so.

The question is whether the industrialized world’s central banks will control the issuance and movement of money, or if regulations inscribed into a new type of software program devised 13 years ago will.

Authorities from the United States, the International Monetary Fund, the Central Bank, and the Bank for International Settlements make the argument that countries could enable financial fraud.

These authorities say counties could also diminish currency controls by trying to adopt cryptocurrencies, while revealing their residents to drastic price volatility.

The risk of a dramatic reduction in the value of Bitcoin — which lost over half its value before November — makes it unsuitable as a national currency, according to Dong He, Deputy Head of the IMF’s Monetary and Financial Sectors Division.

Activists and shareholders who endorse such experimentations argue cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin provide an alternate solution to rapidly inflating monetary systems in locations like Argentina as well as Nigeria.

They say cryptocurrencies are also allowing poor countries to explore alternative solutions to a world’s economic framework intended to benefit rich countries.

They argue the world’s financial stewards’ misgivings have little to do with safeguarding the wellbeing of developing world residents and more to do with perpetuating a system in which rich country monetary authorities control the global currency system.

Even as a dramatic drop in Bitcoin’s price underlined the hazards of such trials, the breadth of the long-simmering debate has grown this springtime.

The Rise of Crypto

In April, the Central African Republic approved legislation making it the world’s second country to recognize Bitcoin as a legal tender.

The World Bank and the IMF, as well as the region banking system that supervises the country’s present currencies, have expressed their objections to the shift.

The Bank of Central African States urged the Central African Republic to repeal its anti-Bitcoin legislation.

It has also taken a stand against cryptocurrencies in general, adopting new laws that require financial institutions under its jurisdiction to break relations with digital currency payment systems.

However, the little government has moved through with its intention to develop a “Crypto Island” to attract foreign investment.

Meanwhile, in El Salvador, the first government to accept Bitcoin as a currency, the project exacerbated a wider breach with western governments that emerged under the leadership of Nayib Bukele, the nation’s popular, authoritarian president.

Recent