In a recent court proceeding, Alina Habba, the attorney for former President Donald Trump, has voiced her concerns about the conduct of Justice Arthur Engoron. Habba described the judge as ‘unhinged’, citing his aggressive behavior during Trump’s testimony.
During a break in the proceedings, Habba expressed her frustration with the judge’s demeanor, noting that his face turned red when Trump was on the witness stand. She accused Engoron of trying to ‘silence’ Trump while he was answering questions about his business empire and the value of Mar-a-Lago.
JUST IN: Donald Trump's attorney Alina Habba says judge Arthur Engoron had an unhinged episode in the court room where he started "slamming" a table.
Kangaroo court.
"You have a right to hire a lawyer who can stand up and stay something when they see something wrong."
"I was… pic.twitter.com/h1ytdEujBu
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 6, 2023
Habba questioned the use of taxpayer dollars in the courtroom, suggesting that the judge had already made up his mind about the case. She argued that as an attorney, she should be able to defend her client without being silenced or disrespected by the judge.
The attorney also criticized New York Attorney General Letitia James, accusing her of attempting to ‘make a name for herself’ by bringing the case against Trump. Habba suggested that James was using the case as a political tool rather than seeking justice.
JUST IN: President Trump’s campaign just released this new statement about the crooked, racist, and corrupt New York Attorney General @TishJames.
Today President Trump is taking the stand and testifying in his own civil fraud trial in NYC.
This hasn’t been a fair trial, at all. pic.twitter.com/R2gdmHzFFq
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) November 6, 2023
During the opening of Trump’s testimony, Habba recounted how she was scolded by Judge Engoron. She emphasized that every individual has the right to hire a lawyer who can stand up for them when they see something wrong.
Habba expressed her disappointment with the American judicial system, stating that she was witnessing its demise. She claimed that the judge was not interested in hearing Trump’s explanation of events because it did not align with his narrative.
The attorney further stated that the judge ‘clearly has an issue’ with facts that do not support his case. She described him as ‘enraged’ and unable to handle Trump’s testimony.
Trump is currently facing a $250 million civil fraud trial in New York. He is accused of inflating his net worth and property values to secure loans on favorable terms. However, Habba argued that the judge had already concluded that Trump committed fraud before the trial even began.
During his testimony, Trump also expressed his frustration with James and the judge. He accused James of being a ‘political hack’ who brought the case against him for her own political gain.
In conclusion, Habba’s defense of Trump highlights the ongoing tension between the former president and the judicial system. It raises questions about the impartiality of the court and the potential influence of politics in legal proceedings.
